Now, more than 5,600 charter schools in the United States serve more than two million students. Every one of those schools has a stated mission that serves as a creed to distinguish their approach. But divided, they’ve lost sight of the broader picture: the mission of the charter school movement first envisioned by Shanker.
Twenty-five years ago, Albert Shanker, then-president of the American Federation of Teachers — the nation’s second-largest teachers union — delivered a stinging rebuke of the reform movement of the 1980s and the majority of students it was leaving behind with its one-size-fits-all approach. He analogized our education system to a doctor who blames a patient when the pill he prescribed doesn’t work — rather than trying a new remedy. His speech, five years after A Nation At Risk, laid out a vision for teacher-inspired and teacher-created schools and later became the ideological foundation for the first charter school initiatives.
Now, more than 5,600 charter schools in the United States serve more than two million students. Every one of those schools has a stated mission that serves as a creed to distinguish their approach. But divided, they’ve lost sight of the broader picture: the mission of the charter school movement first envisioned by Shanker.
2 Comments
In 2010, early in my Teach For America days, I had the opportunity to hear Jason Kamras talk about the changes taking place in D.C. Public Schools. One of the more memorable things he said that day was that if all families in the District of Columbia were forced to send their children to a randomly selected public school without moving out of the city, the city’s education woes would be fixed in a year. His thinking was that if you gave parents of means some skin in the game, they could put more pressure on policymakers to fix the system.
I was reminded of this provocative argument when I read Allison Benedikt’s polemic in Slate, asserting the moral bankruptcy of parents who send their kids to private schools. Though the two arguments differ slightly (Benedikt doesn’t think the positive effect would come as quickly as Kamras did), the fundamental issue is the same: The problem with schools is that parents do not put enough pressure on teachers, administrators, and policymakers to make the necessary changes to fix public education; and the lack of pressure is attributable, in large part, to the fact that the parents with the most political capital either send their kids to private school or to high-performing public schools that are de facto segregated by income level because of property values. Although Benedikt concedes that change might take a long time, the power she seems to see in parent pressure would work over the short term. She explains: With over 100 years of history, Eastern Senior High School has long been known as “The Pride of Capitol Hill.” However, between 1998 and 2008, Eastern Senior High went through eleven principals and a period of tumult. The school graduated its last class of seniors in 2011 before launching a massive turnaround plan. After a $77 million renovation to modernize the aging building and the enrollment of one grade per year to facilitate a smoother culture, Eastern Senior High is once again living up to its nickname. That’s thanks to Rachel Skerritt, who came to the District of Columbia in 2010 to lead the re-launch effort. The decision wasn’t an easy one; she had spent her entire professional career as a teacher, principal, and district administrator in Boston Public Schools, historically a high-performing urban district. The opportunity to “build” a school is what drew her, she says, and the results that the Eastern Senior High community has seen so far has been enough to keep her. Research about teacher turnover and teacher experience produces the following unsurprising conclusions: Teacher turnover has negative consequences on student achievement, and more experienced teachers are more effective (at least during the first five years of teaching, after which effectiveness plateaus). These facts led to an anti-climatic conversation at the New York Times’ “Room for Debate” about whether teachers need to have experience. But that question is off-base; a more productive question to consider is “Why do teachers need experience?” For every 100 students you teach, three will identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) at some point in their life. Yet despite progress towards civil rights legislation designed to create equal opportunity, discrimination and victimization of LGBT people remains high, as reaction to the Pvt. Chelsea Manning case illustrates. Discrimination for LGBT students can be a matter of life or death as was seen with Alexander “AJ” Betts Jr. and Carlos Vigil, who took their lives as a result of bullying. Furthermore, there have been suggestions that homophobic- and gender-based bullying has been tolerated by teachers. As the new school year begins, make a commitment to civil rights by ending sexual- and gender-based bullying in your classroom.
Gender describes the characteristics and activities we associate with men and women, like “boys hate reading and have short hair” and “girls love pink and have long hair.” A survey of elementary school students showed that one in three children heard classmates being bullied for wearing or doing something usually associated with the other gender. Forty-three percent of elementary teachers also reported hearing sexist comments from their students. Of the surveyed students, one in 10 said they didn’t conform to gender norms; they were twice as likely to be bullied at school. While the problem begins in elementary school, it continues and worsens in middle and high school when issues of gender begin to encompass sexual orientation. Another survey of LGBT students in sixth through 12th grade showed that 30 percent felt unsafe in school and 29 percent felt unsafe on their way to and from school. One-quarter had experienced cyber-bullying as a result of their gender expression or sexual orientation, and one-third had been sexually harassed online. |
aboutYEP-DC is a nonpartisan group of education professionals who work in research, policy, and practice – and even outside of education. The views expressed here are only those of the attributed author, not YEP-DC. This blog aims to provide a forum for our group’s varied opinions. It also serves as an opportunity for many more professionals in DC and beyond to participate in the ongoing education conversation. We hope you chime in, but we ask that you do so in a considerate, respectful manner. We reserve the right to modify or delete any content or comments. For any more information or for an opportunity to blog, contact us via one of the methods below. BloggersMONICA GRAY is co-founder & president of DreamWakers, an edtech nonprofit. She writes on education innovation and poverty. Archives
May 2017
Categories
All
|